Brief argues court erred by declaring mistrial based on battering expert testimony; seeks reversal of double jeopardy denial, arguing testimony was acceptable.

Brief argues court wrongly barred duress instruction due to flawed "recklessly placed" reasoning and excluded battering expert testimony, citing social science.

Q&A guide helps advocate expert witnesses explain trauma and trauma responses in victims of battering and other forms of violence.

Describes how community supervision can decrease safety and increase violence for reentering victims of battering by eliminating or limiting viable options.

Guide for community-based advocates to understand and accurately explain complex concepts about trauma to domestic and sexual assault survivors.

Print/text version of a panel interview of formerly incarcerated women regarding their reentry experiences, insights, and suggestions for advocates and practitioners working with reentering survivors.

Study of US state and federal cases, examining how defense and prosecution used expert testimony on battering in criminal cases and how courts ruled on its admissibility.

Explores the role that domestic violence plays in a high percentage of parental kidnapping cases and the need to illuminate that role for a fair applications of justice.

Examines the criminal legal system's impact on domestic violence, focusing on arrest, police response, and survivor safety.

12-page paper highlighting legal risks faced by victims of battering who are charged with crimes and at the same time negotiating civil court proceedings. Suggests approaches to weighing those risks.